The Delhi High Court examined the impugned order and the reasons furnished by the petitioner and found no merit in the challenge. The Court specifically rejected the submissions that the petitioner’s lack of awareness of tax laws or his alleged illiteracy could justify the delay. It held that such a plea was not tenable in law.
Related Posts
‘Less than 50 weapons’: IAF on Op Sindoor; reveals why Pak asked for ceasefire
Air Marshal Narmdeshwar Tiwari recounted Operation Sindoor, revealing that fewer than 50 weapons strikes by the IAF on Pakistani military targets compelled Islamabad to request […]
Delhi horror: Woman strangled, tied to stone and dumped in canal
A woman named Komal was kidnapped and murdered by Asif, an acquaintance. After a dispute, she was strangled, her body tied to a stone, and […]
Fireworks , gas cannisters inside Tesla truck that exploded outside Trump’s hotel
Authorities are investigating a fatal explosion involving a Tesla Cybertruck outside Trump’s Las Vegas hotel, suspected as a possible act of terrorism. The vehicle contained […]