The Delhi High Court examined the impugned order and the reasons furnished by the petitioner and found no merit in the challenge. The Court specifically rejected the submissions that the petitioner’s lack of awareness of tax laws or his alleged illiteracy could justify the delay. It held that such a plea was not tenable in law.
Related Posts
Putin ready for direct talks with Ukraine ‘without any preconditions’
Amidst escalating tensions, Vladimir Putin has proposed direct peace talks with Ukraine in Istanbul on May 15, without preconditions. This offer follows a demand from […]
What makes Nasa’s spacesuit crucial for surviving & how it protects astronauts
The NASA Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU) spacesuit is a vital piece of equipment for astronauts performing spacewalks. It protects them from the harsh environment of […]
Honeytrap issue rocks Karnataka, ‘procedural constraints’ put Congress in a spot
Bengaluru’s Cooperation Minister K N Rajanna submitted a petition to Home Minister G Parameshwara after alleging politicians were honeytrapped. He denied judges were involved and […]