Supreme Court’s Justice Vikram Nath asserted AI can aid judicial processes but won’t replace judges’ core judgment-writing role. He highlighted AI’s limitations in complex cases like matrimonial disputes and constitutional matters. Other judges echoed concerns about AI’s potential for bias and the need for human conscience in justice delivery, emphasizing its role as a facilitator, not a substitute.
Related Posts
Joe Burrow injury update: Bengals QB out vs Steelers after toe surgery
The Cincinnati Bengals face the Pittsburgh Steelers in a crucial AFC North game. Quarterback Joe Burrow is out with a toe injury. Backup quarterbacks Jake […]
‘Relationship turned sour after she gave birth to boy’: Doc accused of killing wife
A doctor from Lucknow is accused of murdering his wife by sedating her and drowning her in a bathtub while on vacation in Thailand. The […]