Supreme Court’s Justice Vikram Nath asserted AI can aid judicial processes but won’t replace judges’ core judgment-writing role. He highlighted AI’s limitations in complex cases like matrimonial disputes and constitutional matters. Other judges echoed concerns about AI’s potential for bias and the need for human conscience in justice delivery, emphasizing its role as a facilitator, not a substitute.
Related Posts
Stock market today: Nifty50 opens above 24,600; BSE Sensex up marginally
Stock market today: Nifty50 and BSE Sensex, the Indian equity benchmark indices, opened in green on Friday. While Nifty50 was above 24,600, BSE Sensex was […]
‘Deeply shocked’: PM Modi condoles ‘horrendous’ Canada school shooting
- admin
- February 11, 2026
- 0
Post Content
‘I felt blessed’: Ishan Kishan dedicates playoff-clinching knock to grieving cousin – Watch
- admin
- May 19, 2026
- 0
Ishan Kishan’s match-winning 70 against Sunrisers Hyderabad was fueled by a personal tragedy, as he aimed to finish the game for his grieving cousin present […]