Supreme Court’s Justice Vikram Nath asserted AI can aid judicial processes but won’t replace judges’ core judgment-writing role. He highlighted AI’s limitations in complex cases like matrimonial disputes and constitutional matters. Other judges echoed concerns about AI’s potential for bias and the need for human conscience in justice delivery, emphasizing its role as a facilitator, not a substitute.
Related Posts
Ben Shelton and Trinity Rodman’s combined net worth and earnings
- admin
- May 13, 2026
- 0
American tennis star Ben Shelton and U.S. soccer forward Trinity Rodman have become one of the most talked-about young sports couples in recent years. Both […]
‘Today’s India not India of 1975’: Tharoor calls Emergency ‘dark chapter’; recalls Sanjay Gandhi’s role
Shashi Tharoor’s critique of the 1975 Emergency, particularly Sanjay Gandhi’s sterilization campaigns, has stirred debate within the Congress party. His article in Deepika highlights the […]
Knife attack in France leaves one dead, Macron labels it ‘Islamist terror act’
A knife attack in Mulhouse, eastern France on Saturday, has left one civilian dead and two police officers seriously injured. President Emmanuel Macron described the […]