Supreme Court’s Justice Vikram Nath asserted AI can aid judicial processes but won’t replace judges’ core judgment-writing role. He highlighted AI’s limitations in complex cases like matrimonial disputes and constitutional matters. Other judges echoed concerns about AI’s potential for bias and the need for human conscience in justice delivery, emphasizing its role as a facilitator, not a substitute.
Related Posts
Jammu man lured into Russian job and sent to war zone killed
- admin
- April 6, 2026
- 0
A 23-year-old Jammu man, Sachin Khajuria, who went to Russia for a job, was sent to the frontlines of the Russia-Ukraine war and has now […]
Kournikova vs Iglesias net worth 2025: Tennis star and music icon compared
- admin
- December 10, 2025
- 0
Anna Kournikova and Enrique Iglesias boast a combined net worth of approximately $160 million in 2025. Kournikova’s wealth stems primarily from lucrative brand deals and […]
Hookah controversy! Irfan Pathan on MS Dhoni: ‘Mere bina khana nahi khate the’
Irfan Pathan’s relationship with MS Dhoni is under scrutiny again after an old interview resurfaced, suggesting Dhoni’s alleged favouritism towards hookah-smoking players. This contrasts with […]