The Supreme Court stated that public interest cannot justify broad access to private information of public officials, emphasizing a balance with the right to privacy. The court will consider a petition challenging the Digital Personal Data Protection Act’s restrictions, which a petitioner argued nullifies RTI provisions for accessing background data of appointees and could enable state surveillance.
Related Posts
‘Will check Kunal Kamra’s call records, bank details’: Maha govt amid ‘gaddar’ joke row
Maharashtra’s junior home minister, Yogesh Kadam, announced that the government will investigate comedian Kunal Kamra’s call recordings and bank statements after he called deputy CM […]
Ex-convict who killed 5 in 1993 held again in Bikaner; had built temple on govt land
Bikaner police have arrested Shribhagwan, a 50-year-old man, for allegedly raping two minor sisters, aged 7 and 9. Investigations revealed a disturbing past, as Shribhagwan […]
‘Your career’s ruined’: Judge warns TISS students linked to Saibaba event
- admin
- January 21, 2026
- 0
In a striking pronouncement, a Mumbai court sounded the alarm for nine TISS students applying for anticipatory bail, warning that their alleged connection to a […]