The Supreme Court stated that public interest cannot justify broad access to private information of public officials, emphasizing a balance with the right to privacy. The court will consider a petition challenging the Digital Personal Data Protection Act’s restrictions, which a petitioner argued nullifies RTI provisions for accessing background data of appointees and could enable state surveillance.
Related Posts
NASA grows plants in space: Key to astronaut health; Mars and deep space travel breakthrough
Growing plants in space, once a distant dream, is now vital for long-duration missions. Astronauts have successfully cultivated zinnias, sunflowers, and wheat on space stations, […]
Delimitation will punish states that controlled population: Congress
Congress has stated that states which controlled population will lose seats due to delimitation based on population criteria. States like Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and Andhra […]
Caitlin Clark vs Sophie Cunningham net worth 2025: WNBA earnings and endorsements
- admin
- January 4, 2026
- 0
Sophie Cunningham and Caitlin Clark have constantly proved their worth in the court. The two young players of the Indiana Fever have sparked chaos with […]