A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan said in such cases, a woman was not eligible to get married due to the subsistence of her marriage and she could not invoke the ground of false promise of marriage. It passed the order while quashing criminal proceedings against a lawyer on a complaint filed by a woman advocate alleging that he had raped her on the false promise of marriage.
Related Posts
Kyle Divine arrest rumors grow amid troubling stepdaughter accusations
- admin
- November 27, 2025
- 0
Online fitness personality Kyle Divine faces serious allegations after a viral Instagram post detailed a chat with a sexual violence hotline. His 16-year-old stepdaughter reportedly […]
Latest discovery: Are we living inside a black hole? Nasa’s James Webb findings stun scientists
The James Webb Space Telescope has observed a surprising alignment in the spin directions of ancient galaxies, challenging the standard cosmological model. A significant portion […]
No SC stay as govt puts key waqf law provisions on hold
The Union government assured the Supreme Court it would refrain from appointments to the Central Waqf Council and Auqaf Boards, maintaining the status quo on […]