A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan said in such cases, a woman was not eligible to get married due to the subsistence of her marriage and she could not invoke the ground of false promise of marriage. It passed the order while quashing criminal proceedings against a lawyer on a complaint filed by a woman advocate alleging that he had raped her on the false promise of marriage.
Related Posts
पाई-पाई को महोताज श्रीलंका, पेट्रोल खत्म, पीएम ने एयरलांस के निजीकरण का रखा प्रस्ताव
अपनी आजादी के बाद श्रीलंका अपने सबसे बुरे दौर से गुजर रहा है। आर्थिक संकट के साथ ही वहां राजनीतिक संकट भी है। यह संकट […]
Common herbal supplement linked to deadly liver disease
Turmeric, celebrated for its health benefits, faces scrutiny due to reports of liver damage linked to supplements, as highlighted by the Daily Mail. Robert Grafton […]
Charity jet sale? China’s 50% discount for Pak sparks online backlash
A controversial plan to supply Pakistan with 30 J-35A stealth fighters at a discounted price has ignited criticism across Chinese social media. Citizens question the […]