A division bench of Justices Chandra Dhari Singh and Sanjiv Kumar, in a 23-page ruling dated Jan 21, tore into contradictions they found in the prosecution’s case — from unreliable testimony of two eyewitnesses to omissions in FIR and what the court called “inherent improbabilities.” Dhani Ram and co-accused Satti Din had been convicted under IPC sections 302 read with 34 for accompanying Maiku during the killing.
Related Posts
San Rechal, Puducherry model known for challenging skin bias, dies by suicide
San Rechal Gandhi, a prominent model from Puducherry celebrated for winning regional beauty pageants including Miss Puducherry 2020, has tragically died by suicide. Police investigations […]
कोरिया : 33 केन्द्रों में फ्रंटलाइन वर्कर एवं हेल्थ केयर वर्कर को 03 फरवरी को लगाए जाएंगे प्रीकॉशन डोज़
कोविड 19 की तीसरी लहर की संभावना को दृष्टिगत रखते कलेक्टर श्री कुलदीप शर्मा के मार्गदर्शन में जिले में कल 03 फरवरी को कोविड 19 […]
‘Atmosphere of global instability’: PM Modi’s message amid US trade stand-off
Amid escalating trade tensions with the US, Prime Minister Modi asserted India’s commitment to prioritizing its farmers, small industries, and youth welfare. He urged citizens […]