A division bench of Justices Chandra Dhari Singh and Sanjiv Kumar, in a 23-page ruling dated Jan 21, tore into contradictions they found in the prosecution’s case — from unreliable testimony of two eyewitnesses to omissions in FIR and what the court called “inherent improbabilities.” Dhani Ram and co-accused Satti Din had been convicted under IPC sections 302 read with 34 for accompanying Maiku during the killing.
Related Posts
‘Plan will be to replicate the past success …’: Karun Nair eyes IPL glory
Karun Nair is set to play for Delhi Capitals in the upcoming IPL season after a stellar domestic performance. Nair is eager to maintain his […]
Australia rightly reclaim BGT, seal WTC Final spot
India lost the Border-Gavaskar Trophy after failing to draw at the SCG, hindered by poor bowling. Australia capitalized on Jasprit Bumrah’s absence and ineffective Indian […]
रायपुर: भेंट-मुलाकात : ग्राम सकरी के रोहित डडसेना ने बताया कि उसने कुल 11 सौ 60 क्विंटल गोबर बेचकर 02 लाख 32 हजार रुपये की आमदनी की है
भेंट-मुलाकात : ग्राम भंवरपुर ग्राम सकरी के रोहित डडसेना ने बताया कि उसने कुल 11 सौ 60 क्विंटल गोबर बेचकर 02 लाख 32 हजार रुपये […]