A division bench of Justices Chandra Dhari Singh and Sanjiv Kumar, in a 23-page ruling dated Jan 21, tore into contradictions they found in the prosecution’s case — from unreliable testimony of two eyewitnesses to omissions in FIR and what the court called “inherent improbabilities.” Dhani Ram and co-accused Satti Din had been convicted under IPC sections 302 read with 34 for accompanying Maiku during the killing.
Related Posts
‘Very close’: India may be first to sign trade pact, says US treasury secy
India may soon be the first nation to strike a bilateral trade deal with the US under President Trump’s reciprocal tariff policy, according to US […]
‘Nahi jitega to bandook tumhari taraf’: Ravi Shastri’s fiery message to Gambhir
- admin
- December 8, 2025
- 0
Head coach Gautam Gambhir faces scrutiny after consecutive home Test series losses. However, former coach Ravi Shastri advocates for shared player responsibility, emphasising that defeats […]