A division bench of Justices Chandra Dhari Singh and Sanjiv Kumar, in a 23-page ruling dated Jan 21, tore into contradictions they found in the prosecution’s case — from unreliable testimony of two eyewitnesses to omissions in FIR and what the court called “inherent improbabilities.” Dhani Ram and co-accused Satti Din had been convicted under IPC sections 302 read with 34 for accompanying Maiku during the killing.
Related Posts
कोण्डागांव : विश्रामपुरी में नवाजतन कार्यक्रम अंतर्गत एक दिवसीय प्रशिक्षण का हुआ आयोजन
बुधवार को जनपद पंचायत कार्यालय विश्रामपुरी में पिरामल फाऊंडेशन एवं शिक्षा विभाग के द्वारा नवाजतन कार्यक्रम एवं एफएलएन के तहत् एक दिवसीय प्रशिक्षण कार्यशाला का […]
How Russian YouTubers get Apple products before launch, while Americans don’t
Russian YouTubers are surprisingly leaking unreleased Apple products, including the M4 MacBook Pro and M5 iPad Pro, weeks before their official launch, even unboxing them. […]
‘Can’t expect to cooperate’: Indian embassy in US on govt freezing Indus Water Treaty
The Indian embassy in Washington defended freezing the Indus Water Treaty with Pakistan, citing Pakistan’s support for terrorism and civilian casualties. India asserts that cooperation […]