A division bench of Justices Chandra Dhari Singh and Sanjiv Kumar, in a 23-page ruling dated Jan 21, tore into contradictions they found in the prosecution’s case — from unreliable testimony of two eyewitnesses to omissions in FIR and what the court called “inherent improbabilities.” Dhani Ram and co-accused Satti Din had been convicted under IPC sections 302 read with 34 for accompanying Maiku during the killing.
Related Posts
Messi’s Kolkata tour chaos: Bengal cops detain orgainser; tickets to be refunded
- admin
- December 13, 2025
- 0
Chaos erupted at Kolkata’s Salt Lake stadium as thousands of fans protested after a brief, tightly controlled appearance by Lionel Messi. The West Bengal Police […]
Twisha Sharma death: Mother-in-law’s lawyer loses cool, beats vehicle bonnet; watch
- admin
- May 22, 2026
- 0
Lawyer for Twisha Sharma’s mother-in-law, Giribala Singh, Advocate Enosh George, had a heated exchange with journalists outside the residence. After his vehicle allegedly ran over […]
Japan on edge: Manga’s July 5 ‘disaster prophecy’ sparks panic
Japan is on edge as a manga artist’s prediction of a catastrophic disaster on July 5, 2025, gains traction, fueled by her accurate forecast of […]