A bench headed by Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha held that the family court’s order showed no illegality or defect warranting interference by the HC. The HC noted that when the husband had filed a petition seeking restitution of conjugal rights, the woman could have returned to her matrimonial home to resume marital life.
Related Posts
‘Fadnavis as cruel as Aurangzeb’: Cong leader’s jab sparks row
Maharashtra Congress chief Harshvardhan Sapak compared CM Devendra Fadnavis to Mughal ruler Aurangzeb, sparking political tension. BJP condemned the remark as an ‘insult to Maharashtra.’ […]
Who was Alex Pretti? 37-year-old identified as man shot dead by federal officers in Minneapolis
- admin
- January 24, 2026
- 0
In a tragic turn of events, 37-year-old Alex Jeffrey Pretti, a US citizen, was shot dead by federal immigration agents in Minneapolis. Officials confirmed that […]
‘Phenomenal contribution’: Sundar Pichai praises H-1B visa that brought him to US
- admin
- November 20, 2025
- 0
Post Content