A bench headed by Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha held that the family court’s order showed no illegality or defect warranting interference by the HC. The HC noted that when the husband had filed a petition seeking restitution of conjugal rights, the woman could have returned to her matrimonial home to resume marital life.
Related Posts
Tech in 2026: The era of AI coworker and Connected Intelligence beckons
By 2026, AI will transition from a talking tool to an autonomous partner, managing tasks and workflows across industries. India is poised to lead this […]
Perez Hilton reacts as Meghan Markle accused of keeping $1,700 photoshoot gown
A resurfaced rumor about Meghan Markle taking a designer gown without permission, dubbed “Green Gown-gate,” has sparked debate. Podcaster Perez Hilton defended Meghan, calling the […]