A bench headed by Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha held that the family court’s order showed no illegality or defect warranting interference by the HC. The HC noted that when the husband had filed a petition seeking restitution of conjugal rights, the woman could have returned to her matrimonial home to resume marital life.
Related Posts
IPL 2025: Ayush Mhatre shows form, finesse beyond his years
Seventeen-year-old Ayush Mhatre’s impressive 94 off 48 balls against Royal Challengers Bengaluru highlights Chennai Super Kings’ shift towards youth. Despite the loss, Mhatre’s maturity and […]
US-Israel-Iran war: What’s the impact on India? Explained in 5 points
- admin
- March 2, 2026
- 0
Ongoing US-Israel conflict with Iran is impacting India’s economy, particularly through rising crude oil prices and potential trade disruptions. Policymakers are monitoring the situation, with […]
Saudi bus accident: 45 Indian pilgrims confirmed dead; one survives
- admin
- November 17, 2025
- 0
A devastating bus fire near Medina in Saudi Arabia has claimed the lives of 45 Umrah pilgrims from Telangana, with only one survivor. The blaze […]