Supreme Court Justice Ujjal Bhuyan voiced strong dissent over the collegium’s decision to transfer Justice Atul Sreedharan, citing executive influence. He argued that such transfers, especially when prompted by the central government, compromise judicial independence and the integrity of the collegium system. Justice Bhuyan emphasized the judiciary’s reliance on public faith.
Related Posts
Enemy of my Enemy: Musk asked his rival to help him buy OpenAI: Who’s he?
Elon Musk approached Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to help finance his $97.4 billion OpenAI takeover bid in February 2025, court filings reveal. Despite their public […]
Saudi bus tragedy: Lone survivor recounts horror; pleads for support
- admin
- December 2, 2025
- 0
The sole survivor of a Saudi bus accident, Mohammed Abdul Shoaib, recounted how a tanker struck their vehicle, causing it to erupt in flames and […]
Govt cuts excise duty to Rs 3 a litre on petrol, to nil on diesel amid Middle East tensions
- admin
- March 27, 2026
- 0
India has reduced its fuel duty, lowering the special additional excise duty on petrol to Rs 3 per litre and removing it entirely on diesel. […]