The Supreme Court swiftly responded to a young advocate’s tearful plea, who alleged her uncle was harassing her and her mother over ancestral property. The bench, led by CJI Surya Kant, ordered immediate legal aid, protection for the duo, and restrained the uncle from alienating property, emphasizing the poor’s right to judicial time.
Related Posts
SpaceX delays Mars mission, Elon Musk says: ‘It is only possible to travel to Mars when …’
- admin
- February 9, 2026
- 0
SpaceX is shifting its near-term focus from Mars to establishing a self-sustaining city on the Moon, citing faster timelines and more frequent launch opportunities. Elon […]
TCS Nashik case: No court relief for absconding pregnant employee
- admin
- April 20, 2026
- 0
A pregnant TCS employee in Nashik, accused of religious harassment, was denied interim relief by the court. She sought anticipatory bail, citing her pregnancy and […]
‘Why Taylor Swift?’: MLB fans fume over popstar’s growing presence; debate erupts
Pop singer Taylor Swift’s image appeared in Major League Baseball. FOX Sports: MLB used her photo to display a score between the Baltimore Orioles and […]