Justice Ujjal Bhuyan dissented with CJI B R Gavai’s recall of a prior judgment, arguing the majority overlooked environmental jurisprudence fundamentals. Justice Bhuyan defended the original verdict, emphasizing the precautionary principle over the ‘polluter pays’ principle. CJI Gavai noted his departure from tradition by not altering his judgment after receiving the dissent.
Related Posts
‘Unacceptable’: MEA condemns attack on Indian-flagged ship off Oman coast
- admin
- May 14, 2026
- 0
India has strongly condemned an attack on an Indian-flagged ship near Oman, deeming it ‘unacceptable’ and expressing deep concern over ongoing threats to commercial shipping. […]
कोरिया : लोक सेवा गारंटी के अंतर्गत लंबित प्रकरणों के शीघ्र निराकरण के निर्देश
- admin
- October 20, 2021
- 0
कलेक्टर श्री श्याम धावड़े के निर्देश एवं मार्गदर्शन में सीईओ जिला पंचायत श्री कुणाल दुदावत ने साप्ताहिक समय सीमा की बैठक में जिले में मुख्यमंत्री शहरी […]
Telangana lashed by heavy rain: Schools shut as downpour continues for 24 hours
Telangana has been experiencing heavy rainfall for the past few days, with several districts receiving over 10 cm of rain in the last 24 hours. […]