Justice Ujjal Bhuyan dissented with CJI B R Gavai’s recall of a prior judgment, arguing the majority overlooked environmental jurisprudence fundamentals. Justice Bhuyan defended the original verdict, emphasizing the precautionary principle over the ‘polluter pays’ principle. CJI Gavai noted his departure from tradition by not altering his judgment after receiving the dissent.
Related Posts
‘Hum kuch nahi kar sakte’: Pakistan captain on boycotting India match at T20 World Cup
- admin
- February 1, 2026
- 0
Pakistan captain Salman Ali Agha confirmed the team will follow government directives regarding their participation in the T20 World Cup after it was decided they […]
17 years after father’s murder, youth hacks dad’s killer to death
In Chennai, Yuvanesh, a 19-year-old college student, avenged his father’s murder by killing Raj Kumar, the original perpetrator. The 2008 murder of Yuvanesh’s father fueled […]