Justice Ujjal Bhuyan dissented with CJI B R Gavai’s recall of a prior judgment, arguing the majority overlooked environmental jurisprudence fundamentals. Justice Bhuyan defended the original verdict, emphasizing the precautionary principle over the ‘polluter pays’ principle. CJI Gavai noted his departure from tradition by not altering his judgment after receiving the dissent.
Related Posts
NEET UG 2025 exam city intimation slip released, admit card expected by May 1
The National Testing Agency (NTA) has released the NEET UG 2025 city intimation slip on April 23, ahead of the May 4 exam. Over 23 […]
Gold price prediction today: What is the price outlook in the coming days?
- admin
- December 8, 2025
- 0
Gold price prediction today: Gold prices are hovering near recent highs, fueled by expectations of a US Federal Reserve rate cut. Weak US jobs data […]
Dehradun floods: Farmer clings to 50m pole for 5 hours above raging river
In a dramatic rescue, Desh Pal, stranded on an electricity pole for five hours amidst a raging river in Dehradun, was saved by an NDRF […]