Justice Ujjal Bhuyan dissented with CJI B R Gavai’s recall of a prior judgment, arguing the majority overlooked environmental jurisprudence fundamentals. Justice Bhuyan defended the original verdict, emphasizing the precautionary principle over the ‘polluter pays’ principle. CJI Gavai noted his departure from tradition by not altering his judgment after receiving the dissent.
Related Posts
Pepper spray, Hidma posters and broken barricades: Protest over Delhi pollution stuns cops
- admin
- November 24, 2025
- 0
A clean-air protest at Delhi’s India Gate took a surprising turn as demonstrators displayed posters of slain Maoist commander Madvi Hidma. Police arrested 22 individuals […]
Unnao rape case: CBI moves SC; challenges suspension of Sengar’s life term
- admin
- December 26, 2025
- 0
Post Content
Stock market today: Nifty50 rallies past 25,200; BSE Sensex rises over 900 pts
Stock market today: Nifty50 and BSE Sensex, the Indian equity benchmark indices, soared in trade on Tuesday after Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Iran […]